Tweet This: 1 In 5 Banks Are Twitter Quitters

Who's adding the most followers? Does tweeting more boost follower counts? Answers to banks' tough Twitter questions in this exclusive study from The Financial Brand -- follower growth, tweeting efficiency and other performance metrics for over 300 U.S. retail banks. The hard data doesn't lie.

By Jeffry Pilcher

Published on November 13th, 2012 in Social Media Strategies

This study encompassed 314 banks on Twitter, estimated to represent around 4.2% of all U.S-based deposit-taking retail institutions in the U.S. and at least 20% of all such banks on Twitter. Only banks that sent at least one tweet from a public Twitter account with a customized profile were included. Banks with uncustomized or protected accounts, and those with no tweets or followers were ignored. This is believed to be the first and only public study of its kind in the retail banking industry.

The Prototypical Bank on Twitter

If you took the 314 banks in this Twitter study and picked one right in the middle (#157, the median), this is what that bank would look like: They would have launched their account in late September 2009, accruing 277 followers since then — an average of one new follower gained every four days. During that time, they would have sent around 330 total tweets, or one about every 3-4 days. They’d follow no more than 100 accounts back.

Twitter Quitters

A total of 67 accounts (21.3%) were found to be dormant or abandoned entirely. Accounts considered dormant or abandoned did not send a tweet in at least the last 6 weeks. That means more than one in five banks launching a Twitter initiative gave up (21.3%). This is nearly identical to the number of credit union Twitter quitters The Financial Brand identified back in February — 74 of 350 credit unions studied, or 21.1%.

But banks didn’t roll over as easily as you might suspect. The average bank quitting Twitter sent an average of 128 tweets over a period of 1 year and 9 months before throwing in the towel.

Six of the 18 banks that adopted Twitter in 2008 have since shut down their accounts. 51 of the 67 banks quitting Twitter had started their account in 2009 (76%), while only 10 that started in 2010 have quit.

The bank on Twitter longest before surrendering — Foster Bank — had created their Twitter account way back in April 2008 and kept it account active until March 2012. Their 1,527 followers haven’t heard a peep from them in seven months.

Another bank walked away from their account after sending 1,107 tweets over a period stretching two years.

-- Article continued below --

Follower Growth

18.4% of banks at least doubled their follower base in the last year, but only 15 total (5.3%) saw increases of more than 200%. The average annual growth rate was 90%. The median, however, was only 51.1% — meaning half the banks studied only added one new follower (or less) for every two followers they had the year prior.

84.5% of banks added less than 400 followers in the last year — less than one per day. Five banks actually lost followers over the past 12 months, with Pinnacle Bank (SC) losing the most — a net loss of 348 followers, down to 5,132.

Total # of followers (all 314 banks): 626,164
Median # of followers: 277
Average # of followers: 1,994
Number of accounts with over 1,000 followers: 45 (14.3%)
Number of accounts with less than 200 followers: 141 (44.9%)
Average # followers added per day: 1.97
Most followers of any bank: 106,959 (Citi)

Ranked by Net
New Followers
New
Followers
in Last
Year
Total
Followers
Today
% YoY
Follower
Growth
Avg.
Followers
Added
Per Day
(All-Time)
Avg.
Followers
Added
Per Day
(Last Year)
1Citi96,925106,959966%94.2265.5
2BofA Community67,40898,424217%130.7184.7
3BofA News49,75456,734713%75.9136.3
4Wells Fargo18,29331,250141%15.150.1
5USAA16,15436,61479.0%24.444.3
6BofA Help13,73031,59876.8%22.537.6
7TD Bank US8,92213,193209%11.224.4
8BofA Careers8,12020,45365.8%20.322.2
9Ally7,2879,563320%10.220.0
10Union Bank4,7845,1461322%3.513.1
Ranked by % Increase
in New Followers
% YoY
Follower
Growth
New
Followers
in Last
Year
Total
Followers
Avg.
Followers
Added
Per Day
(All-Time)
Avg.
Followers
Added
Per Day
(Last Year)
1FirstMerit Bank3980%3984080.31.1
2Union Bank1322%4,7845,1463.513.1
3Citi966%96,925106,95994.2265.5
4BofA News713%49,75456,73475.9136.3
5Citi Jobs557%4,2975,0684.111.8
6Huntington Bank504%3,3764,0463.69.2
7MB Financial349%6117860.71.7
8Fifth Third339%1,8772,4313.65.1
9Ally320%7,2879,56310.220.0
10Associated Bank317%7369682.02.0

Tweeting Activity

Of those banks actively tweeting in the past year, one in four averaged at least one tweet per day. 50% of banks studied sent less than one tweet every three days. One in 10 banks (11.3%) sent fewer than 20 tweets… that’s total — all year long.

Three banks actually deleted tweets, resulting in a net negative for the number of tweets they "sent" last year. For instance, the number of tweets Secure Trust Bank has sent (all-time) dropped from 43 to only 5 showing now.

Total # of tweets sent (all 314 banks in the study): 475,330
Median # of tweets sent: 330
Average # of tweets sent per bank: 1,514
Average # of tweets sent per day per bank: 1.49
Most tweets sent by a single bank (all-time): 127,958 or 91 per day (BofA_Help)

Ranked by
Most Tweets
Sent Last Year
New Tweets Sent
in Last Year
Total Tweets
Sent All-Time
Avg.
Tweets
Per Day
Last Year
Followers
Added
Per New
Tweet
1BofA Help79,852127,95856.920.17
2TD Bank US19,55827,46716.600.46
3Ask SunTrust17,44934,89014.860.09
4Citi Help11,99620,58610.670.27
5Ally8,14112,9858.720.90
6State Bank of WW4,7647,4924.440.03
7Citizens4,0135,5375.420.43
8Citi3,0115,7992.6532.19
9BofA Careers2,5877,6292.563.14
10North Shore2,3895,2821.490.36
-- Article continued below --

Tweeting Efficiency

One way to evaluate banks’ use of Twitter is to compare the number of tweets they send to the number of new followers they add. You could call this a "tweeting efficiency" ratio. Those banks who send out few tweets but get the most followers in return have a "high tweet efficiency," while those who send out disproportionately more tweets than they get followers could be considered to have a "low efficiency." Here are the top 10 most efficient tweeters — those who yielded the biggest bang for a minimal investment. Bottom line: Sending out a bunch of tweets is no guarantee you’ll get a ton of followers.

Ranked by Tweet
Efficiency
New
Followers
Per Tweet
in Last
Year
New
Followers
in Last
Year
New
Tweets
in Last
Year
Total
Followers
Today
% YoY
Follower
Growth
1BofA News100.3149,75449656,734713%
2BofA Community80.3467,40883998,424217%
3Citi32.1996,9253,011106,959966%
4Wells Fargo12.5018,2931,46431,250141%
5USAA7.8616,1542,05636,61479.0%
6BofA Tips8.872,6342974,461144%
7First National Bank TX7.55831122160.1%
8Union Bank4.694,7841,0195,1461322%
9Square 1 Bank4.112305667052.3%
10HomeTown Bank5.33961843828.1%

Sorry, Not Following You

Social media experts are constantly nagging banks to use social channels to "listen." Well, it’s pretty darn hard to "listen" on Twitter if you aren’t following anyone. Sure, banks might be using social media monitoring software… but you know most aren’t.

The average bank follows one account for every 3-4 followers they have. Of the 314 banks studied, 40 follow more accounts than they have followers.

Banks that follow fewer than ten accounts will struggle to ever break 1,000 followers themselves — most will have 175-300 followers.

One common theory among social media experts is that you can boost the number of Twitter users following you if you go out and follow a bunch of accounts yourself. This theory does seem to bare itself out in the study’s data; those banks who added the most followers also started following the most new accounts.

Total # of accounts followed (all 314 banks): 184,628
Median # of accounts followed: 98
Average # of accounts followed: 588
Number of banks following no one: 19 (6.1%)
Number of banks following 10 accounts or less: 59 (18.8%)
Most accounts followed by one bank: 34,501 (BofA_Help)

Ranked by Most
Accounts Followed
Following
2012
Following
2011
New
Accounts
Followed
in 2012
Followers
Total
New
Followers
in Last
Year
Ratio of
Followers
to
Following
1BofA Help34,50115,85018,651 (#1)31,59813,730 (#6)0.9:1
2USAA25,8957,48118,414 (#2)36,61416,154 (#5)1.4:1
3Wells Fargo Help14,701n/an/a15,433n/a1:1
4Citi Help10,1586,4973,661 (#4)9,3173,240 (#14)0.9:1
5TD Bank US7,1043,8023,302 (#5)13,1938,922 (#7)1.9:1
6Pinnacle Bank SC5,4265,543-117 (last)5,132-348 (last)0.9:1
7Citi4,6924,428264 (#29)106,95996,925 (#1)23:1
8USAA Help
3,8661,2102,656 (#6)6,5652,067 (#16)1.7:1
9Citi Jobs3,83003,830 (#3)5,0684,297 (#11)1.3:1
10PNC Virtual Wallet3,3172,1841,133 (#9)4,0251,846 (#18)1.2:1

Account Longevity

Average # of years active on Twitter: 1.97
Banks active on Twitter less than a year:
28 (12.1%)
Banks active on Twitter for 1 year:
32 (10.2%)
Banks active on Twitter for 2 years: 78 (28.4%)
Banks active on Twitter for 3 years: 166 (52.9%)
Banks active on Twitter for 4+ years: 9 (3.2%)
Bank on Twitter the longest: Wells Fargo (5.7 years)

There doesn’t appear to be any correlation between when accounts were created and follower growth. In other words, there is no real, significant advantage (at least in terms of follower growth) to being an early adopter.

There seems to be only one thing that can spike massive follower growth: Twitter Verification. Only banks big enough to partner with Twitter can get verified because they are the only ones who can afford to pay for promoted tweets and accounts. (Twitter only verifies accounts for celebrities and its advertisers.) Basically, if you’re big enough, you can buy followers. Only three of the following 15 accounts aren’t verified by Twitter: USAA, USAA Help and Citi Jobs.

Ranked by
Highest Daily
Follower
Growth
Avgerage
Followers
Added
Per Day
Account
Created
Years
Active
Total
Followers
1BofA Community130.72010 Oct2.198,424
2Citi94.22009 Oct3.1106,959
3BofA News75.92010 Oct2.056,734
4USAA24.42008 Oct4.136,614
5BofA Help22.52009 Jan3.831,598
6Chase21.92010 Feb2.721,995
7BofA Careers20.32010 Feb2.820,453
8Wells Fargo15.12007 Mar5.731,250
9TD Bank US11.22009 Aug3.213,193
10Ally Bank10.22010 Apr2.69,563
11Citi Help8.32009 Oct3.19,317
12PNC News5.42009 Dec2.95,700
13USAA Help
4.32008 Sep4.26,565
14Citi Jobs4.12009 Jun3.45,068
15BofA Tips4.12009 Nov3.04,461

Why Don’t More Banks Give Up?

Nearly two-thirds of banks on Twitter have less than 200 followers. Three in five added fewer than 100 new followers last year. 83% add less than one new follower every two days. Two thirds sent less than 200 tweets in the past 12 months, and a third have sent fewer than 200 tweets ever. And yet they’ve been at it an average of two years.

It makes you wonder… Why don’t more banks just give up already?

There are two kinds of financial institutions on Twitter: a handful who take it seriously (mostly big banks)… and everyone else, who should probably ask themselves, "Why bother?"

Many are just going through the motions, spewing lame tweets about rate changes or happy holiday wishes. These guys can probably find more productive things to do with their time.

The Financial Brand is your premier destination for comprehensive insights in the financial services sector. With our in-depth articles, webinars, reports and research, we keep banking executives up-to-date with the latest trends, growth strategies, and technological advancements that are transforming the industry today.

© 2025 The Financial Brand. All rights reserved. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of The Financial Brand.