Should Banks Charge Fees For Check Writing?

Consumers shopping for new checking accounts aren't as interested in writing unlimited checks as they were only three years ago. It's just not a selling point for financial marketers anymore... but it could be a source of revenue.

Interest in the unlimited check writing feature among consumers shopping for new checking accounts has been slowly declining. This correlates with industry data showing that as electronic payment methods like debit cards and online bill pay increase, the number of checks written decreases. Fewer consumers need to write a lot of checks, so demand for unlimited check writing has declined.


Yet most banks and credit unions still offer unlimited check writing on all of their checking account products. In fact, of the 137 institutions listed on FindABetterBank, only 12% of institutions offer a checking account product that limits how many checks can be written per month. Most limit usage by charging fees per check over an amount per month (e.g., 3 checks per month free) and a few allow checks to be written only from specific accounts.

In most cases, the cost of processing payments by paper check is higher than the cost of processing electronic payments. Therefore, if all other things are equal, customers who write fewer checks cost less to service. At the same time, charging for check writing generates incremental revenue and encourage customers to use less expensive payments. Should banks continue to offer this service for free, or should they charge customers in order to push them towards more cost-efficient payment methods and generate incremental revenue?

This article was originally published on . All content © 2024 by The Financial Brand and may not be reproduced by any means without permission.