ChatGPT Is Stealing Your Customer Relationships. You Already Have the Solution

By Steve Cocheo, Senior Executive Editor at The Financial Brand

Published on February 11th, 2026 in Personalization

Simple Subscribe

Subscribe Now!

Stay on top of all the latest news and trends in the banking industry.

Consent Granted*

In a financial services system that’s continuously changing, consumers increasingly need advice and guidance. Ongoing research by J.D. Power offers good news and bad news.

The good news: When consumers do get direction from their bank, satisfaction with it is a significant contributor to their overall positive feeling about the institution, as measured by J.D. Power.

The bad news: The company’s 2025 U.S. National Banking Satisfaction Study found that, in spite of this strong appetite, only 27% of consumers surveyed say they currently receive advice and guidance from their banks.

The research also uncovered aspects of the institutions’ advice and guidance that aren’t working as well as they might. And it identified a potential source of strength: virtual assistants.

All this lies in the shadow of the increased willingness of consumers, especially those under 40, to consult general AI tools like ChatGPT for financial input.

Need to Know:

  • Consumer satisfaction with the country’s nine largest retail banks rose for the third straight year in 2025, up eight points year over year for a total of 666 out of 1,000 possible points.
  • Consumers 64 and younger drove satisfaction up by 12 points, while satisfaction among people older than that didn’t budge.
  • Virtual assistants give institutions that offer them a big leg up in the rankings, although they are not yet a passport to the top.

Understand the Difference Between Guidance and Advice

Use of bank advice may be muted because many consumers simply aren’t aware that they can get advice from their bank, according to Paul McAdam, senior director of banking and payments intelligence.

He adds that increasing the range of advice available may also help.

“We recommend to banks that they should be seeking to provide more advice, and not just on big life events, investments and retirement,” says McAdam. “For example, consumers react very favorably to receiving guidance on how to avoid fees, how to use the bank’s mobile app, and more.”

McAdam sets out the differences between guidance and advice in J.D. Power’s lexicon.

Guidance refers to information that helps the customer use the bank’s services and benefit from them. Guidance, says McAdam, can lead to opportunities to provide advice.

Advice, on the other hand, is seen as more specific and more personalized. “Advice helps you decide how to choose or use the most appropriate financial services option for your unique circumstances, needs and goals,” says McAdam.

The top five types of guidance and advice cited by percentages of consumers in the study base are (including some ties):

  • Ways to use the bank’s products, services or technology, 21%
  • Investment-related advice, 13%
  • Quick tips and information to improve their financial situation, 8%
  • Borrowing and credit-related advice, 6%
  • Retirement-related advice, 6%
  • Ways to help pay bills on time, 6%
  • Ways to reduce fees paid to the bank, 6%
  • Saving for a goal or large purchase, 5%

Read more:

-- Article continued below --

Two Key Consumer Concerns: Investments and Fraud

J.D. Power’s study dug into two specific areas of interest in guidance and advice.

Investments, wealth management and retirement: Some consumers reported low awareness of whether their banks even provide such services. McAdam says low awareness may be the result of the large institutions aiming such advice strictly to people who are already affluent.

Three important needs for advice are long-term planning, generational wealth transfer and retirement planning.

Even where advisors do exist, consumer sentiment is mixed. Some customers are pleased with what’s available and rely on the expertise. However, “some call out poor advisor availability, limited expertise or inconsistent guidance, which erodes their trust.”

Another negative: Some bank customers complain about poor returns in bank investment products.

Fraud: A key finding is that banks make or break their reputation in “the moment of fraud response.” How well their bank explains an issue, the quality of their guidance, and how quickly they provide remediation determine if they earn the consumer’s trust.

Banks also score points for providing proactive guidance on how to avoid fraud in the future.

Read more: Four Ways Banks Can Turn Fraud Into a Loyalty Play

Virtual Assistants Boost Satisfaction. But They Aren’t a Panacea

Overall, advice and guidance metrics have helped improve national bank satisfaction ratings over the last three years, McAdam says.

But there’s a twist.

Many of the nine large banks covered in the study — including Chase, Bank of America, PNC and Wells Fargo to varying degrees — have been leaning into branching, expanding coverage while optimizing their networks.

Reality check: Yet, overall, J.D. Power found that satisfaction with branch and call center staff performance have been falling over the last five years. Branch representatives remain the primary point where consumers begin their search for advice, with 28% of queries starting in that channel.

Virtual assistants are moving in. At the same time, six of the banks studied offer virtual assistants — Bank of America’s Erica, U.S. Bank’s Smart Assistant, Capital One’s Eno, Chase Digital Assistant, Wells Fargo’s Fargo, and Truist Assist. These tools can guide, suggest and provide some in-the-moment advice, depending on their sophistication.

Over the years, J.D. Power has asked consumers about their usage of these automated forms of advice and guidance to retail banking services. The firm has uncovered trends that should concern institutions that don’t offer virtual assistants.

Use of virtual assistants has expanded beyond “innovators” and “early adopters,” according to the research, and is now being adopted by “early majority” consumers.

The payoff: Nearly one in five consumers banking with the six banks offering virtual assistants use them, versus 13% in 2021. Importantly, overall satisfaction among consumers who use the banks’ virtual assistants is 35 points higher (698 total) versus consumers who don’t use them (663 total).

McAdam says this is a significant statistical difference. J.D. Power likewise found that use of virtual assistants improves net promoter scores.

Nearly a third of virtual assistant users rely on them to obtain information about their bank accounts without having to deal with humans in the contact center. And 26% use the assistants to address account problems.

During Bank of America’s 2025 investor day, officials said that 60% of Erica’s interactions with customers were proactive outreach, and that nearly all queries to Erica resolve without human intervention. The bank has also implemented a form of Erica to help employees answer customer queries more quickly.

Read more: More Banking Apps Offer Predictive Insights, But Many Alerts Arrive Too Late

-- Article continued below --

The Competition: Use of Artificial Intelligence Tools

Lurking in these findings is another factor identified in separate J.D. Power research from mid-2025. Its Polaris pulse survey for July 2025 found that 51% of respondents use AI tools to find information and answer questions. Usage is much stronger among consumers under 40.

In daily usage of the tools, the leading category is searches for banking and financial information — 13% of users.

Here’s a rundown on consumers’ financial queries to AI:

  • Savings strategies, 45%
  • Credit scores and credit cards, 41%
  • Investing and stock market advice, 36%
  • Budgeting and managing expenses, 36%
  • General financial education, 36%
  • Cryptocurrency, 29%
  • Taxes and tax filing, 29%
  • Retirement planning, 22%
  • Loans and mortgages, 20%

A handful of users — 13% — say they completely trust the answers they find, but the majority say they sometimes (40%) or often (38%) verify the information AI provides. A minority of 7% only use AI answers as a starting point.

Banks will likely have to beef up their role in both forms of advice, human and digital. The uses for ChatGPT et al enumerated above don’t fully overlap with the types of queries that customers make of their banks, but that tally and the success seen by the virtual assistants suggest that advice and guidance will increasingly be provided by both human and machine as consumers grow more comfortable with AI.

Read next: How Can Banks Reel in Gen Alpha? Try Learning From Roblox.

About the Author

Profile PhotoSteve Cocheo is the Senior Executive Editor at The Financial Brand, with over 40 years in financial journalism, including the ABA Banking Journal and Banking Exchange. Connect with Steve on LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/stevecocheo.

The Financial Brand is your premier destination for comprehensive insights in the financial services sector. With our in-depth articles, webinars, reports and research, we keep banking executives up-to-date with the latest trends, growth strategies, and technological advancements that are transforming the industry today.

© 2026 The Financial Brand. All rights reserved. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of The Financial Brand.