‘It Won’t Happen to Us:’ The Dangerous Mindset Minimizing Crisis Preparation
Most financial institutions only start thinking about crisis management when they’re already in the middle of one. Smart and timely preparation will make it easier to prevent fires rather than scramble to extinguish them.
By Mary Poliakova, PR consultant, Co-founder & COO of Drofa Comms
Most financial companies only start thinking about crisis management when they’re already in the middle of one, making the impact far worse than it needs to be. How can companies ensure they’re ready and avoid critical mistakes that could cost them their reputation?
Common Mistakes in Crisis Communication
The main mistakes in crisis situations include companies staying silent and not releasing official statements from management, creating a vacuum of information and promoting the spread of rumors. For example, during the Credit Suisse collapse in 2023, the bank failed to communicate effectively with its stakeholders. Credit Suisse largely remained silent, allowing speculation to spread. It was later revealed that there were multiple discrepancies between official statements and the actual measures taken, which further fueled market panic and eroded trust.
This example highlights the following mistake: vague and uninformative official statements. In a crisis situation, it is important to clearly and very precisely explain how it will affect customers and what steps are being taken to solve the problem. However, it’s not enough to simply explain the problem; companies must also react in a timely manner. Long-term coordination of the official position with lawyers leads to a delayed reaction and ignoring social networks makes it impossible to quickly convey the company’s point of view to the audience.
The lack of a pre-formed anti-crisis team — including PR, lawyers, marketing and top management — with clearly defined roles and action items, can also have a negative impact. Companies’ uncoordinated and emotional statements by founders or senior executives may only exacerbate the situation and cause even more distrust. All public statements should be formulated beforehand with a cool head.
Learn more:
- When Your Partners Fail: Hard Lessons from the Capital One Outage
- The Customer is King: Why the CMO Must Become the Customer Expert
- How to Turn Your Execs into Expert Media Spokespeople
Key Principles of Crisis Communication
First and foremost, companies should not underestimate the importance of communication, especially when things are not going well. During a crisis, many companies prefer to sit quietly and wait without informing or sharing anything about their measures and actions in connection with the crisis. This is the wrong approach.
Silence gives competitors enough space to thrive and gain a market advantage. Meanwhile, journalists won’t stop working on hot stories. When you don’t share anything meaningful with them or your audience, they may collect and publish rumors and misinformation about your company. And the lack of comments creates the ground for negative interpretations.
Therefore, transparency and efficiency are key principles of anti-crisis communication. If you are clear in your messages and give quick responses, it allows the company to control the information agenda. The surefire way to gain and maintain trust is to promptly and regularly inform your company’s investors during a crisis through your own channels. Post statements from representatives on social media every two to three days so that people don’t have to worry about the unknown.
Publishing official positions in respectable media further strengthens the company’s credibility. To achieve it, build the right communication strategy: adhere to a single official position, provide clear and structured information, and ensure that messages are accessible to customers and partners. Depending on the level of turmoil in the company, the list of actions can include organizing the dissemination of information by wire or even a personal interview with a company representative and subsequent publication.
How to Prepare For a Crisis and Minimize Reputational Damage
Before launching any PR campaign, it is worth carefully examining the crises competitors have experienced, how they got out of difficult situations, what statements they published and where. Learning from the mistakes of others means not only avoiding problems, but also adopting the best solutions.
It is important not only to look at other people’s experiences, but also to understand your own weaknesses. Identify vulnerabilities, consider what risks may arise, which departments should be involved, and most importantly, how quickly the response should take place. A clear distribution of roles and a ready-made action plan will help to avoid chaos and not waste time at a critical moment.
But the best defense is a good offense — being prepared long beforehand is key. Long-term PR strategies make the brand sustainable and help keep its reputation on top even in crisis situations. Regular reports, business transparency, active work with the audience, and partnerships with market leaders and regulators — all strengthen trust and reduce the likelihood of reputational problems. The stronger your position before the crisis, the easier it is to survive any turbulence.
3 Steps for Building a Solid Crisis PR Plan
Companies shaping up to be ready for any crisis should take the following steps:
- Build brand strength long before the crisis
The more stable your brand is, the easier it is to deal with any shocks. The trust of stakeholders gained over the years can form a solid foundation that will help maintain a good reputation even in difficult times. - Study your competitors and learn from their mistakes
Analyze what crises your competitors have experienced, what mistakes they have made and what solutions have proved successful. This will not only help your company avoid other people’s mistakes, but it will also equip you with proven strategies for quick response. - Create an anti-crisis team and a clear plan of action
Appoint those responsible for crisis communications in advance — PR, lawyers, marketing and top management. Everyone should have a clear role and step-by-step instructions on who does what in an emergency. It is also important to assess the company’s weaknesses and potential risks in advance in order to prepare an approximate scenario for a quick response.
Overall, if you build your process in accordance with these principles, you will wind up preventing fires rather than scrambling to extinguish them.