How Community Institutions Can Turn Data into a Competitive Advantage
By Nicole Volpe
Simple Subscribe
Subscribe Now!
Community financial institutions’ competitive advantage has always rested on two pillars: deep local market knowledge and strong accountholder relationships. What’s more, much of that advantage was held by the people closest to the market — sales and marketing teams, commercial lenders, and product owners. They knew their communities well enough to understand, and often anticipate, customer needs.
Reality check: That local knowledge still matters. But as banking has shifted to digital channels, fewer customer interactions take place in the branch and location matters less. That makes the relationship advantage harder to sustain through the traditional combination of personal contact and applied local knowledge.
Increasingly, the signals that once surfaced through those interactions can be found in the institution’s data. Financial institutions can see where their accountholders deposit and spend money, what products they use, how they borrow and save, and how their balances change over time. In some cases, they can see which other financial providers they use. The problem is that much of that information sits in separate systems maintained by different business lines and third-party providers. And until institutions consolidate it, they cannot fully use what they know about customers to personalize the digital experience.
By now, of course, most institutions understand where the marketplace is headed and what they need to do to keep pace. CSI’s 2026 Banking Priorities Survey makes clear that regional and community financial institutions increasingly view stronger analytic capabilities as a foundation for improving engagement. Respondents ranked technology modernization as their top strategic priority, and when asked where AI could most benefit their institution, 55% pointed to advanced data analytics, nearly on par with cybersecurity at 57%.
Key insight: For community banks and credit unions, the challenge is to turn that ambition into a plan they can execute. This requires establishing a model under which they can harness customer information and leverage it going forward to personalize the accountholder experience. In an interview with The Financial Brand, CSI’s Chief Data and AI Officer Daniel Haisley, offered a roadmap for smaller financial institutions looking to put their customer data to work.
Step 1: Start With the Data Foundation
Effective personalization requires centralized customer data. At most community financial institutions, however, data remains fragmented across disconnected systems. Core platforms house deposit records. Origination and servicing systems manage loan portfolio data. Onboarding applications add demographics and firmographics. Compounding the problem, an institution’s commercial, retail, and private banking divisions may maintain disparate views of the same client. To enable personalization, these systems must deliver a unified view of the relationship.
The first task, Haisley said, is to identify all of the relevant sources and bring the data into a single data store. That requires standing up data pipelines from individual systems, then normalizing and cleansing the information so it can be used consistently. Even something as simple as an address can appear in several different formats. Institutions then need a semantic layer, or data dictionary, that enables consistent machine-reading of data fields across systems.
Key insight: Haisley cautions against underestimating the work. Depending on the institution and its technology partners, simply establishing access to the necessary data can take months of effort. Institutions need to decide early whether they have the people and expertise to do that work themselves or should rely on outside partners.
Step 2: Define the Jobs to Be Done
Institutions should beware the trap of letting technology dictate what they do with the data once they have it. A new analytics platform or AI capability can surface enormous amounts of information, but the institution must decide the customer problems and business opportunities that are worth pursuing. “Don’t fall in love with the tools,” Haisley said. “Fall in love with the problems to solve.”
The next step, then, is to identify where better use of customer data can create value and drive growth. Haisley suggests working from the outside in, developing hypotheses about market demand or customer segments poised for deeper engagement or cross-marketing. Opportunities might include business-banking clients whose transaction history indicates they are headed toward a cash-flow shortfall; or customers who hold high-rate debt with another provider; or routine money transfers to a brokerage firm.
Key insight: As institutions learn what their data can reveal, they can build a working library of useful signals and insights. Over time, that library gives the institution an arsenal of tactical insight to draw on and, more importantly, a clearer view of their data store’s overall potential.
Step 3: Turn Insight into Action
The institution must next focus on how to use these insights, which Haisley describes as a distribution problem. “I have my data warehouse in place, and I’ve chosen the problems I want to go and solve,” he said, “Next comes the creative part: How do I get in front of these people?”
Once a bank knows which customer or business issue it wants to address, it has to decide how that insight is best activated for each segment or opportunity. In some cases, the insight may be surfaced to a relationship manager for outreach. In others, it may be embedded in the digital experience or delivered through direct marketing channels.
The idea is to leverage an accountholder’s backstory to influence their future experience — connecting insights to specific moments in their journey. Haisley offered the example of a bank that presents a short welcome video from the CEO to accountholders logging into its digital platform for the first time. Another institution provided digital walkthroughs to commercial customers when they first encountered more complicated treasury management services that require multiuser entitlements or approval workflows.
The content described in these examples is only relevant to individuals who are new to a particular service. Presenting it to others would signal to them that their institution doesn’t know them, and might even reduce their engagement
Step 4: Measure, Learn, and Iterate
The final step is to operationalize the process. Haisley says the worst outcome is to invest in data readiness and technology tools but not build sustainable workflows. Continuous measurement and iteration are essential. Institutions should track what happens when they act on a signal, learn from the result, and adjust the next efforts.
Key insight: According to Haisley, successful institutions will become active and willing experimenters: “They’re trying things, they have a culture of failing fast and that being okay. You learn what works and you iterate 5% each time.” That mindset can be difficult in banking, where avoiding failure is often deeply ingrained. The goal is to create a cycle in which iteration and measurement lead to continuous improvement.
Progress Before Perfection
Bottom line: Community institutions’ traditional advantage will not disappear overnight. The larger risk is that other providers will learn to reproduce more of that value in online contexts, while making it increasingly easy for customers to move their money. Haisley points to large banks, fintechs, and embedded-finance partnerships as competitors that can change the market quickly. “Those that are reactive are in trouble,” he said. “Those that are proactive will defend and expand their customers and clients.”
That puts a premium on using the information community institutions already have. The goal is not to match larger competitors feature for feature but to use data to extend deep market knowledge into digital channels. For community banks and credit unions, better analytics can become a way to carry their relationship advantage into a banking environment where fewer of those relationships are built face to face.
