Precision and Execution, Not Scale, Will Power the Banks That Survive

Executive Summary

• Despite posting their strongest profits since before the 2008 financial crisis, banks face concerns that recent gains came primarily from high interest rates, not operational improvements, and will evaporate as rates continue to normalize.
• Yet a subset – just 14% of banks worldwide — have successfully broken away by combining smart structural choices with rigorous execution. A new report from McKinsey and Co. argues that these winners share a common three-part playbook:
  • They pick high-value segments carefully.
  • They achieve scale in strategic pockets.
  • They execute on capabilities like customer analytics, talent management, and AI deployment.
• They also share a decisive “management quotient”: these banks’ leaders skillfully deployed the three-part playbook to create sustainable value.

Banking leaders face a peculiar problem. The industry just posted its best two-year run since before the Great Recession. Global banks generated $7 trillion in revenue and $1.1 trillion in profits. Capital ratios hit healthy 12.8% levels. Banking created more total profit than any other sector worldwide. Walk into any industry conference, and you’ll hear confident talk about digital transformation and customer-centricity.

So why do investors profess profound skepticism? The market prices banking at 0.9 times book value, dead last among all global industries. That valuation suggests that investors actually expect banks to destroy economic value over time, not create it.

The gap between profits and market confidence stems from fundamental questions about banking’s future. Labor productivity in major markets keeps declining despite banks spending $600 billion annually on technology, the highest proportion of revenue among all sectors. Even the most profitable banking pools face fierce competition from focused attackers: private credit providers, payment specialists, wealth management platforms.

Looking ahead, banks’ revenue margins are projected to compress from 3.1% in 2023 to 2.7% by 2030 as interest rates normalize. To maintain current return on tangible equity under these conditions, banks would need to reduce cost-to-asset ratios from 1.3% to 0.9%. McKinsey says that would require annual cost reductions of 5%, five times faster than the industry’s historical performance.

Meanwhile, the competitive landscape keeps shifting. Two-thirds of financial asset value growth now occurs in off-balance-sheet products like mutual funds and alternatives, where non-traditional competitors hold advantages. Traditional deposit franchises face dual pressures: quantitative tightening that has reduced deposit volumes 6 to 10% annually since 2021 in the U.S. and Europe, plus competition from money market funds offering higher yields. Commercial real estate originations have dropped 55% from pandemic peaks and sit 25% below their ten-year average, while existing CRE assets face devaluations that many banks haven’t fully realized.

In this environment, finding profitable growth becomes increasingly difficult.

Where Winners Play: Structural Advantages That Matter

The good news? McKinsey says 14% of banks worldwide have cracked the code. McKinsey’s analysis suggests that the winning banks share three structural markers.

First, they pick the right segments for growth, while avoiding dangerous concentration. Some have grown commercial portfolios that carry inherently lower expense ratios, reducing overall costs. Others have leveraged platforms in wealth management and payments, businesses that generate fee income to offset pressure on net interest margins. The key is investing decisively in chosen segments without tipping into concentration risk that threatens safety and soundness.

Second, winners find scale where it matters. While economies of scale remain elusive at the overall industry level, scale does exist in specific pockets. Leading banks identify these pockets — in particular product lines, customer segments, or operational processes — and move aggressively up the scale curve to create margin advantages.

Third, they optimize their location, either geographically in the physical world or metaphorically in the customer value chain. Some banks shape their footprint toward markets with above-average economic prospects. Others control critical customer touchpoints or decision moments that competitors must flow through. This positioning creates structural advantages that compound over time as customer relationships deepen and switching costs rise.

Dig deeper:

• New Breeds of Partners Are Key to Community Banks’ Competitive Ambitions
• 3 Steps to Help Your Financial Institution Stay Ahead of Evolving Cyber Crime
• How the End of the Safe Deposit Box Is a Signal for Banking’s Future

The Playbook is Not Enough: The Management Quotient

For these retail banking leaders, however, real leverage comes through superior execution, what McKinsey calls the “management quotient” that will define winners in the remaining years of this decade.

The data bears this out: among 90 top U.S. banks from 2013 to 2023, McKinsey says that execution factors explained the 14-point total shareholder return spread between top and bottom deciles. Revenue growth accounted for 34% of outperformance, better net interest margin management another 34%, fee income growth 16%, and cost efficiency 5%.

Some of the critical execution approaches McKinsey observes:

1. Deep relationships through customer-centricity and ecosystems. One leading institution retooled itself to create personalized experiences focusing on products like wealth and home equity, running as many as four marketing campaigns monthly. It connected this to segmentation that determines who answers the phone, what script they use, and what ongoing servicing support customers receive.
2. Customer primacy through mobile-orchestrated distribution. A winner in a digitally advanced nation invested heavily in shifting from omnichannel distribution to truly mobile-orchestrated strategy. It elevated mobile as the orchestrator of all customer journeys, standardized other channel operations, moved specialized services into a remote advisory model, and invested in orchestration across customer relationship management systems. This approach doesn’t just reduce costs; it creates superior customer experiences that drive retention and cross-sell.
3. Strategic talent management, to win with clients and unlock productivity. Top performers focus on return from talent, using people to differentiate their client value proposition. They’ve built strategic HR capabilities that recruit candidates in days instead of months, compensate at the top quartile, maintain high employee satisfaction scores, and inspire workforces to exceed customer expectations. In an industry facing productivity challenges despite massive technology spending, human capital management becomes a critical differentiator.
4. Embedded advanced analytics in both the cultural fabric and operating models. While true artificial intelligence is still emerging, several leading institutions lean heavily into machine learning, deep learning, and generative AI. Some have publicly announced efficiencies worth billions of dollars, as much as a full percentage point of efficiency ratio, from these efforts. The key is moving beyond pilot programs to embedding AI across operations, from credit decisions to customer service to marketing personalization.

The Question Every Retail Banking Leader Must Answer

The banking industry stands at an inflection point. Recent profitability provides breathing room, but the market’s valuation discount reflects legitimate concerns about sustainable value creation.

Yet the banks that do achieve escape velocity demonstrate that breakout performance is possible even in this challenging environment. They succeed not through strategy or execution alone, but through both simultaneously: structural positioning combined with rigorous operational discipline.

The alternative? Posting respectable accounting profits while slowly eroding economic value.