Wealth Management Has a Terrible Marketing Problem: Sameness
By Daniel Darst, CMO, F.L.Putnam
Simple Subscribe
Subscribe Now!
Wealth management has become better at scale and worse at explaining why one firm is meaningfully different from another.
As firms consolidate, standardize and segment clients more precisely, the promise of personal advice risks becoming increasingly generic.
Key insight: The opportunity here is to make a firm’s real distinctions, its expertise, experience and humanity feel genuinely unique.
Need to Know:
- The United States had approximately 23.6 million dollar millionaires in 2025, adding more than 440,000 in one year, according to the 2026 UBS Global Wealth Report.
- UBS estimates 4.1 million U.S. adults hold between $5 million and $100 million in wealth.
- Cerulli Associates projects $124 trillion will transfer through U.S. estates by 2048 — about $105 trillion to heirs and $18 trillion to charity.
- 16,544 advisers are serving 73.7 million clients (as of 2025), according to the Investment Adviser Association.
- Merger and acquisition deal volume among registered investment advisers reached 466 transactions in 2025, a gain of 27.3% year over year, according to Echelon Partners.
The Differences are Real, but the Language is Not
Wealth firms are different, in fact, quite different:
- Some are very good at transferring wealth across generations.
- Others live deep in charitable giving, tax strategy or business succession.
- Some are serious investors, with convictions about securities and markets.
- Others understand the family decisions that gather around money: the child who’s ready, the one who isn’t, the second marriage no one quite knows how to discuss.
Key insight: These distinctions matter. They shape advice and reflect experience, habits and conviction.
What goes wrong: That’s where things start. But somehow, when the marketing kicks in, suddenly everyone is comprehensive, holistic, customized and fiduciary. The marketing may include a photograph of a prosperous-looking couple walking somewhere pleasantly indeterminate.
The words aren’t false. They’ve simply been used so frequently that they no longer tell prospects very much.
What’s a Wealth Client to Do?
Customers don’t make decisions and choices in a vacuum. Dozens of variables drive the wealth client’s ultimate selection of an adviser.
In the U.S., this market has mushroomed, according to Cerulli: 23.6 millionaires including 4.1 million adults with wealth between $5 million and $100 million.
Then comes the transfer.
Cerulli expects $124 trillion to move through US estates by 2048, some $105 trillion to heirs and $18 trillion to charities.
In the industry, we call this a demographic opportunity.
Reality check: And it is an opportunity. However, that opening entails a very long procession of human events: deaths, inheritances, businesses sold, retirements, second marriages, charitable decisions, siblings who agree — and siblings who decidedly do not.
Read more: Why Marketers Can’t Promote Wealth Management Right Until They Understand What’s Changed — and Why
Assets Move Because Something Has Happened to Somebody
More wealth generally does require more capability from a wealth adviser. Among a deep roster we’d list: broader investment choices, deeper tax and estate coordination, trust expertise, private-market diligence, liquidity planning and experience with complicated ownership structures.
Many wealth management providers sort and structure their perspective by wealth bands, that is, demographic, behavioral and money-in-motion factors cross-tabbed and made into a system.
The Industrialization of Financial Intimacy
Wealth management has spent two decades getting larger — while promising to remain small.
The SEC-registered adviser sector reached 16,544 firms serving 73.7 million clients in 2025. Schwab’s 2026 benchmarking study found that participating RIA firms increased assets 17%, revenue 13.2%, and clients 4.7% during 2025. Echelon Partners counted a record 466 RIA merger and acquisition transactions in 2025, up 27.3% from the year before.
None of this is inherently bad. Scale can support better technology, strong cybersecurity, deeper investment teams, specialized planning, trust capabilities and continuity. A larger firm can do things a smaller organization simply cannot afford to do.
The marketing twist: But it creates an “interesting” tension:
- As firms grow larger, they start talking more about intimacy.
- As service menus expand, every relationship becomes unique.
- As operating systems become more standardized, the word “customized” seems to appear with greater frequency.
I call this the industrialization of intimacy: personal attention delivered at institutional scale, then describing it in language shared by almost everyone else.
Why this matters: The danger isn’t merely dull advertising. It’s that eventually the promise and the experience begin to drift apart.
Read more: Credit Unions Should Own Wealth Management. So Why Do They Lag Their Competitors?
Banks Have an Advantage (but Often Cave to a Temptation)
Banks should be formidable wealth competitors. But they trip themselves up. They have the deposits, they underwrite the mortgages, extend the credit, and often finance the business. They should know quite a bit about the client’s financial life before the wealth conversation even begins.
So wealth management would appear to be the next, obvious step. And sometimes it is.
But a sensible idea such as “Understand the whole client” typically deteriorates to a different idea, “Sell the whole institution.”
Harmless, maybe even helpful, no? Perhaps.
But for a wealth client with specific needs and a degree of discernment, the hard sell of credit cards, CD rates, insurance and investment ideas is just not needed.
Read more: Mass Affluent Wealth Clients Need Both Digital Tools and Better Human Advice
Why Product Solutions Aren’t Advice
Often bankers venturing into wealth management miss the big point of the business.
The question isn’t how many client needs an institution can identify. It’s whether the next recommendation improves the client’s position. It’s about sequencing, timeliness, and thoughtful design of a program — not about meeting this quarter’s sales goals.
Independent wealth firms face the opposite temptation.
Rather than fall prey to answering bank competition by becoming “lesser” banks, their advantage is focus: serious investing and consequential advice. A well-tuned independent wealth firm can access credit, custody and other services without needing to manufacture every one of them.
The Client is More Visible (and Less Seen Than Ever)
Wealth firms know more about clients and prospects than ever.
Demographic variables have multiplied. Behavioral signals show what people read, search for, and respond to. Data can identify a business sale, inheritance, retirement or relation, sometimes before the individual has quite decided what the event means.
Key insight: The wealth management industry is remarkably good at detecting life moments, but perhaps less good at interpreting them.
A signal triggers a campaign. The campaign begins a journey. One firm’s next-best action starts to look suspiciously like everybody else’s.
What lies beneath: But data cannot fully explain what the event means to each particular person. That is still the work of advice — noticing what doesn’t fit, understanding what isn’t in the data, and sometimes simply saying: “Not yet, not that way, not for you at this moment.”
Marketing Should Reveal the Work Wealth Managers Do
For wealth management marketers, the answer isn’t another adjective, e.g. bespoke, customized, tailored, particular.
The job is to make the firm’s value to the client visible. Consider these possible strengths:
- If a firm is unusually good at generational transfer, show the tensions it knows how to anticipate.
- If charitable planning is a real strength, talk about the decisions that come before selecting the charitable vehicle.
- If the firm understands private markets, show how it distinguishes real opportunity from access dressed up as opportunity.
- The same is true of business succession, concentrated stock positions, tax strategy and trust work.
Read more: Prepare Your Wealth Strategy for the New Generation of Affluent Clients
Capabilities Only Matter If Clients See How They Influence Decisions
That requires a little more skill, a little more nerve on the marketer’s part.
Specificity will exclude. A point of view invites disagreement. Actual people are less polished than brand copy.
Key insight: The firm that says everything safely may eventually say nothing anyone remembers.
Five Key Questions Wealth Management Marketers Should Be Asking
Here are a set of guiding questions marketers should ask:
- Which clients and situations do we understand unusually well? Not whom can we serve. Rather, where have we actually learned something.
- What do we believe about investing and advice? A service menu is not a point of view.
- Where is the proof? This should not be a compliance issue. Instead, it should be a candid discussion of what your people are doing, where they spend their time, and some of the outcomes, writ broadly.
- What gets better as we grow, and what might decline? This is how we can better examine our DNA and culture.
- What should we decline to become? “Know thyself” remains pretty good positioning advice.
The big picture: Our industry doesn’t lack meaningful distinctions. It has simply become reluctant to state them plainly.
Our clients aren’t looking for radically new vocabulary. They’re trying to figure out who has actually done the work, who understands their situation, and who might be worth listening to when the easy answer isn’t good enough.
Read next: Why Citibank Integrated Retail Banking and Wealth Management to Build Primacy
