NY Times classic on bank name changes
A New York Times article from 1987 says the scramble for good names causes some normally staid financial institutions to wage trademark battles.
It seems some things never change, like these familiar reasons to change names:
“Banks seeking to change their names are attempting to upgrade their image and to convey to their customers their broader market strategies.” — NY State Department of Banking Commissioner Howard B. Brown
Regarding the financial cost of changing names, the article shares a realistic perspective:
“Even a small bank can expect to spend upwards of $500,000 on marketing, logo design, legal costs and other associated expenses, but that many of the banks feel it is a step they have to take.”
Yep, that’s right: $500,000. In 1987 dollars.
Previous related stories from The Financial Brand:
- Advanta forces Avanta to become ‘Altana’
- GE FCU evolves name to ‘General Electric Evendale Employees FCU’
- Bank naming article circa 2000
- Update: Battle over ‘Commerce’ name heats up
Katrina. Haiti. Floods. Tornados. Are you prepared if disaster strikes? Check out this free playback of a Bankerstuff webinar, “Disaster Planning for Financial Facilities: Beyond IT and Business Continuity,” brought to you by Momentum, a world-class design-build firm for financial institutions and a sponsor of The Financial Brand. CLICK HERE FOR INFO
Tags: name changes, NY Times
Filed under: Naming, Trademark Law