NY Times classic on bank name changes
December 22, 2007
A New York Times article from 1987 says the scramble for good names causes some normally staid financial institutions to wage trademark battles.
It seems some things never change, like these familiar reasons to change names:
“Banks seeking to change their names are attempting to upgrade their image and to convey to their customers their broader market strategies.” — NY State Department of Banking Commissioner Howard B. Brown
Regarding the financial cost of changing names, the article shares a realistic perspective:
“Even a small bank can expect to spend upwards of $500,000 on marketing, logo design, legal costs and other associated expenses, but that many of the banks feel it is a step they have to take.”
Yep, that’s right: $500,000. In 1987 dollars.
Share
Previous related stories from The Financial Brand:
- Advanta forces Avanta to become ‘Altana’
- Bank naming article circa 2000
- GE FCU evolves name to ‘General Electric Evendale Employees FCU’
- Update: Battle over ‘Commerce’ name heats up
SPONSORED MESSAGE: Is your bank or credit union ready to go green with its branches? Watch this free webinar playback, “Green Is The New Black,” where the branch-building experts at Momentum outline the strategy, rationale, challenges, advantages and ROI of eco-friendly financial facilities. WATCH NOW
Filed Under: Naming, Trademark Law
Tags: name changes, NY Times
