Satisfaction with automotive finance providers is significantly higher among dealers who have a preferred relationship with their lender, which is driven by a higher number of automated approvals, faster funding, more interactions with their sales representative and a perceived increase in the flexibility of the lender’s buying policy, according to the J.D. Power and Associates 2012 U.S. Dealer Financing Satisfaction Study released today.
Preferred relationships are instituted by lenders that want to capture a larger percentage and/or a certain mix of a dealership’s business and are often targeted to the lender’s best dealerships. Preferred dealers who complete a certain volume or mix of their business with their lender are often rewarded under the terms of preferred relationships with rate discounts, better access to special programs and an improved service experience, compared with traditional relationships.
Among preferred dealers, overall satisfaction with their prime retail credit lender is 919 (on a 1,000-point scale), compared with 845 among dealers without a preferred arrangement. The largest gaps in satisfaction scores between preferred and traditional relationships are in the usefulness of dealership visits (9.3 vs. 8.1, on a 10-point scale, respectively), and flexibility of the buying policy attributes (9.1 vs. 7.9, respectively).
Learn how institutions around the country are saying goodbye to phantom growth with a new approach that creates real growth that lasts. Download eBook.
Does the value outweigh the risk? The three key considerations for evaluating whether to invest in growing an internal program or exploring an outsourced solution.
“The usefulness of dealership visits and the flexibility of the buying policy are among the most important attributes of the overall relationship, so the gap in scores is extremely significant,” said Lisa Chubliski, client services director of auto finance at J.D. Power and Associates.
Nearly two-thirds (63%) of dealers in a preferred relationship indicate they receive funding in less than 24 hours vs. 46% of dealers in a traditional relationship. There is an even larger difference in the frequency of sales representative visits, with 58% of dealers in a preferred relationship receiving sales representative visits 12 times per year vs. 33% of dealers in a traditional relationship.
“While not new to the industry, preferred relationships are increasing and are becoming an intriguing alternative to traditional relationships for both parties involved,” said Chlubiski. “Once the preferred relationship is established, dealerships are finding it easier to complete deals, service their customers quickly and optimize the relationship with their lender.”
The study finds that preferred relationships are not exclusive to the captive lenders.
“While captive lenders, by nature, offer a large percentage of preferred relationships, a notable 56% of banks and 30% of independents also offer preferred relationships,” said Chlubiski. “While preferred relationships may lead to more business and better service for the dealership, they are not necessarily the right fit for all relationships. The fear of restrictions or the potential of damaging other relationships may push dealerships to remain in traditional relationships with lenders.”
Preferred relationships are designed to have a considerable impact on the percentage of dealership business sent to lenders. Among lenders that account for between 26% and 50% of a dealer’s total prime business, 79% are lenders who are defined as “preferred.” That percentage increases to 90% among lenders that account for more than 50% of a dealer’s total prime business.
Dealer Financing Satisfaction Findings
The study examines dealer satisfaction with lenders in four finance areas: prime retail credit; sub-prime retail credit; retail leasing; and floor planning. Satisfaction is measured across three factors in the prime retail credit and sub-prime retail credit areas: finance provider offering; application/approval process; and sales representative relationship. Four factors are measured in the retail leasing area: finance provider offering; application/approval process; sales representative relationship; and vehicle return process. Three factors are measured in the floor planning area: finance provider credit line offering; floor plan support; and floor plan portfolio management.
Dealer satisfaction with automotive lenders has increased across all areas. Overall dealer satisfaction with prime retail credit lenders averages 885, an increase of 23 index points from 2011. Retail leasing satisfaction is 891, up 14 points from 2011, and floor planning satisfaction is 913, up 10 points.
Prime Retail Credit – BMW Financial Services ranks highest among prime retail credit lenders with a score of 963. Following in the rankings are Alphera Financial Services (959) and Mercedes-Benz Financial Services (948).
Retail Leasing – BMW Financial Services ranks highest among lessors in the retail leasing area with a score of 959. Mercedes-Benz Financial Services follows closely in the rankings with a score of 958. Ford Credit ranks third with a score of 911.
Floor Planning – Mercedes-Benz Financial Services ranks highest among floor planning lenders with a score of 964, followed by BMW Financial Services (960) and Ford Credit (935).
The 2012 U.S. Dealer Financing Satisfaction Study is based on responses from 3,064 dealers who were surveyed between March and April 2012.