<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Westpac Resurrecting Dead Brand for Online Direct Arm?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thefinancialbrand.com/9412/westpac-resurrects-bank-of-melbourne-brand/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thefinancialbrand.com/9412/westpac-resurrects-bank-of-melbourne-brand/</link>
	<description>Ideas and insights for financial marketers.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 18:48:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Editor</title>
		<link>http://thefinancialbrand.com/9412/westpac-resurrects-bank-of-melbourne-brand/comment-page-1/#comment-3809</link>
		<dc:creator>Editor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 23:35:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thefinancialbrand.com/?p=9412#comment-3809</guid>
		<description>Hi Gerd,

Thanks for taking the time to shed some light on UBank&#039;s strategy.

There&#039;s nothing inherently wrong with a spin-off brand. It makes sense if you have a solid strategy, such as the one you outlined above. But presently, it doesn&#039;t seem clear why &lt;em&gt;Bank of Melbourne&lt;/em&gt; would be the brand to resurrect. Why not give a new, snazzy online bank a hip new name like &lt;em&gt;UBank&lt;/em&gt; or &lt;em&gt;Redneck?&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Gerd,</p>
<p>Thanks for taking the time to shed some light on UBank&#8217;s strategy.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s nothing inherently wrong with a spin-off brand. It makes sense if you have a solid strategy, such as the one you outlined above. But presently, it doesn&#8217;t seem clear why <em>Bank of Melbourne</em> would be the brand to resurrect. Why not give a new, snazzy online bank a hip new name like <em>UBank</em> or <em>Redneck?</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gerd Schenkel</title>
		<link>http://thefinancialbrand.com/9412/westpac-resurrects-bank-of-melbourne-brand/comment-page-1/#comment-3807</link>
		<dc:creator>Gerd Schenkel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 20:56:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thefinancialbrand.com/?p=9412#comment-3807</guid>
		<description>Hello - and thanks for the coverage. In response to one of the questions raised above: From a UBank perspective, we have opted for a new brand in order to clearly communicate the differences between the core, NAB branded offering, and the new UBank offering. UBank has a narrow, specialist product set that can only be operated using UBank channels (primarily telephone &amp; online, and no branches) and is designed &amp;  priced accordingly. In addition, our brand symbolizes our values which each and every staff member at UBank lives every day. 

Gerd from UBank.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello &#8211; and thanks for the coverage. In response to one of the questions raised above: From a UBank perspective, we have opted for a new brand in order to clearly communicate the differences between the core, NAB branded offering, and the new UBank offering. UBank has a narrow, specialist product set that can only be operated using UBank channels (primarily telephone &amp; online, and no branches) and is designed &amp;  priced accordingly. In addition, our brand symbolizes our values which each and every staff member at UBank lives every day. </p>
<p>Gerd from UBank.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

