Is a rebrand in your future? Don’t do anything without this list of five must-ask questions.   GET THE LIST
Onovative | Level Up With Core iQ

Report: There Will Be 20% Fewer Branches Within 10 Years

The number of bank branches continues to fall as more consumers opt to handle their financial matters in digital channels.

The number of bank branches in the United States will shrink by as much as 20% in the next years, according to a study from commercial real estate firm JLL.

The report says that the mobile channel and innovations in fintech are driving this shift from bricks to clicks. The reductions also come as banking providers look for ways to improve margins by pushing self-service options and lower-cost digital alternatives.

Just before the 2007 global financial downturn, there were roughly 97,000 branch banks in the U.S. The banking industry continued to add more net new branches through 2009 until the severity of the recession finally sunk in. At the same time, adoption of smartphones was skyrocketing enabling mobile banking to take a firmer hold among consumers.

This forced traditional banks and credit unions to reevaluate their retail delivery strategies — consolidating and optimizing their brick-and-mortar networks. As a result, the FDIC estimates that there are almost 7,700 fewer branches in the U.S. today. This represents a decline of close to 8% in the number of locations nationwide.

“The number of branch locations will continue to shrink, and we won’t miss them,” said Geno Coradini, EVP and lead of JLL’s retail group. “While customer access to branches remains important, the necessity of a branch network is being balanced with advances in mobile platforms and fintech.”

“The branch strategy of relying on sheer numbers to win market share is a thing of the past,” Coradini added. “It is no longer about which brand has the most locations — the ‘bricks’ — but how effectively the bank is delivering services to its customers and their need for remote, anytime, anywhere access for transactions — the ‘clicks.'”

The contraction in the number of branches isn’t distributed equally across the country. Some markets are seeing greater reductions, while others — like Los Angeles, San Jose, Nashville and Boston — are seeing more branches opening than closing.

Read More:

CO-OP Financial | eBook: Payments Disruptors, Innovations & Trends

Walter Bialas, Director of Research with JLL, said he expected their research to reveal growth in the number of branches in the nation’s hottest population centers such as Florida, California and Texas. But it wasn’t so; even those regions saw drops.

“Although a few markets seem to have bucked this trend, net branch additions in these markets are modest and may have more to do with local location optimization, as well as bank holding company expansion and M&A dynamics, than a targeted growth initiative,” the report said.

JLL was keen to stress that their findings don’t suggest that the branch bank is disappearing.

“There’s not a complete retrenchment in the industry,” Bialas explained. “It’s more of an optimization.”

Despite branch locations closing across the nation, total U.S. bank deposits have grown more than 40% since 2010. In other words, consumers aren’t ditching banks, they’re just changing the way they use them.

Read More:

The Financial Brand has not only forecast that the number of branches would contract, but that the size of branches would shrink as well. This prediction isn’t necessarily supported by the data found in JLL’s report. The average square footage for existing branches in the U.S. is 4,988. But in JLL’s research, they identified 100 or so new projects that have either been built or are currently underway, and those branches average 5,372 square feet — an increase of 7.7%.

JLL estimates that U.S. banking industry could save as much as $8.3 billion annually if it trimmed the number of branches and downsized the average bank branch from 5,000 to 3,000 square feet. It is The Financial Brand’s position that — in most locations — there is no reason to build a new branch larger than 2,500 square feet, and that 1,000 to 1,500 square feet will be adequate in many situations.

To meet customer needs and regional demographics, JLL says banking providers will offer both full-scale operations and smaller “convenience” locations for basic transactions. Examples of these “convenience locations” include branches inside a grocery store or other micro/nano branches within a hub-and-spoke delivery model.

JLL also says automated branches are an inevitability. People today are more accepting of banking innovations than in years past, so consumers should expect to see greater use of remote tellers assisting with basic transactions.

“The introduction of automated tellers is pivotal for banks to limit real estate costs, however it will take time for customers to fully embrace a technology that introduces a whole new customer service experience,” said Coradini. “Optimizing market coverage is neither quick nor easy, but the long-term cost savings from this shift can be significant as banks also eliminate and shrink existing locations.”

( Read More: Will Robots Replace Tellers In Bank Branches? )

All content © 2017 by The Financial Brand and may not be reproduced by any means without permission.

Digital Banking Report | 2017 Marketing Trends

Comments

  1. Network optimization has to take in consideration footprint (number of branches), format (type/size of facility) in an omni-channel environment by market/region. JLL view is a fair view from the Real Estate perspective; despite the fact that is very interesting, it could easily lead to revenue loss (through attrition), overinvestment due to branch rightsizing, customer migration to nearest bank, and, at the end, destroying value for shareholders.
    Each individual action / change in a branch has to be evaluated from a whole business development perspective, as an individual investment project in a given market. That is why, as mentioned in the article, for financial services industry the evolution won’t be “neither quick nor easy” and I would add, risky if not properly (strategically) done.

Speak Your Mind

*

Show Comments