<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Fresh Stab at Ranking Financial Brands</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thefinancialbrand.com/580/a-stab-at-ranking-financial-brands/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thefinancialbrand.com/580/a-stab-at-ranking-financial-brands/</link>
	<description>Ideas and insights for financial marketers.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 May 2012 12:13:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeffry Pilcher</title>
		<link>http://thefinancialbrand.com/580/a-stab-at-ranking-financial-brands/comment-page-1/#comment-164</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeffry Pilcher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 18:13:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thefinancialbrand.com/?p=580#comment-164</guid>
		<description>I believe OnPoint is classified correctly in Bancography&#039;s rankings. Their assets are around $2.5-3.0 billion, which puts them in Bancography&#039;s category of &quot;assets greater than $1 billion.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe OnPoint is classified correctly in Bancography&#8217;s rankings. Their assets are around $2.5-3.0 billion, which puts them in Bancography&#8217;s category of &#8220;assets greater than $1 billion.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Olga Haley</title>
		<link>http://thefinancialbrand.com/580/a-stab-at-ranking-financial-brands/comment-page-1/#comment-161</link>
		<dc:creator>Olga Haley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 17:20:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thefinancialbrand.com/?p=580#comment-161</guid>
		<description>Please update OnPoint&#039;s assets.  Inforamtion can be found on their website. www.onpointcu.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please update OnPoint&#8217;s assets.  Inforamtion can be found on their website. <a href="http://www.onpointcu.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.onpointcu.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeffry Pilcher</title>
		<link>http://thefinancialbrand.com/580/a-stab-at-ranking-financial-brands/comment-page-1/#comment-149</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeffry Pilcher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 19:30:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thefinancialbrand.com/?p=580#comment-149</guid>
		<description>Good point Ron.

Are you familiar with Young &amp; Rubicam&#039;s &quot;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.brandassetvaluator.com.au/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Brand Asset Valuator&lt;/a&gt;?&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good point Ron.</p>
<p>Are you familiar with Young &#038; Rubicam&#8217;s &#8220;<a href="http://www.brandassetvaluator.com.au/" rel="nofollow">Brand Asset Valuator</a>?&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron Shevlin</title>
		<link>http://thefinancialbrand.com/580/a-stab-at-ranking-financial-brands/comment-page-1/#comment-148</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron Shevlin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 19:19:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thefinancialbrand.com/?p=580#comment-148</guid>
		<description>Good commentary on the methodology. Personally, I don&#039;t see how this brand ranking approach -- or pretty much any of them -- helps FIs to manage, invest, market, etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good commentary on the methodology. Personally, I don&#8217;t see how this brand ranking approach &#8212; or pretty much any of them &#8212; helps FIs to manage, invest, market, etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

