<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Guaranty Bank Bulldozes 16 New Houses</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thefinancialbrand.com/5783/guaranty-demolishes-model-homes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thefinancialbrand.com/5783/guaranty-demolishes-model-homes/</link>
	<description>Ideas and insights for financial marketers.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 May 2012 12:13:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Luke "Kip" Owen</title>
		<link>http://thefinancialbrand.com/5783/guaranty-demolishes-model-homes/comment-page-1/#comment-2256</link>
		<dc:creator>Luke "Kip" Owen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 18:18:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thefinancialbrand.com/?p=5783#comment-2256</guid>
		<description>Was just talking to John Wessman the other day.  Really great guy and I think the ideas about donating some of the home appliances to charity would have been a nice touch but when you&#039;re under the gun from the government to cut loses and start raising capital like they are you tend to make quicker decisions on things like this.  While this community may not be happy with their decision, the investors may see this as a positive sign that Guaranty is doing everything it can to sure up their problem loans and right now Guaranty&#039;s focus is on raising capital from these investors.  I&#039;m sure if they could go back and do it over they would have added in the charity idea.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Was just talking to John Wessman the other day.  Really great guy and I think the ideas about donating some of the home appliances to charity would have been a nice touch but when you&#8217;re under the gun from the government to cut loses and start raising capital like they are you tend to make quicker decisions on things like this.  While this community may not be happy with their decision, the investors may see this as a positive sign that Guaranty is doing everything it can to sure up their problem loans and right now Guaranty&#8217;s focus is on raising capital from these investors.  I&#8217;m sure if they could go back and do it over they would have added in the charity idea.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

