<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What’s the Deal with Financial Ad Disclosures?*</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thefinancialbrand.com/494/financial-ad-disclosures/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thefinancialbrand.com/494/financial-ad-disclosures/</link>
	<description>Ideas and insights for financial marketers.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 May 2012 12:13:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Templeton</title>
		<link>http://thefinancialbrand.com/494/financial-ad-disclosures/comment-page-1/#comment-100</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Templeton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 15:50:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thefinancialbrand.com/?p=494#comment-100</guid>
		<description>I was just noticing this same situation comparing game pieces from a Fazoli&#039;s in store contest (not a financial brand, I realize, but hear me out). Each piece had a different prize, one from Fazolis and one from Blockbuster.

The statement of what you won from Fazoli&#039;s took up 75% of the game piece with a small one or two sentence disclosure at the bottom.

The Blockbuster piece described the prize in a miniscule font at the top of the piece, occupying roughing 10% of the space. The other 90% of the available space was filled with even smaller text disclosing how the piece could be used, on what products, where it could be used and so on.

Needless to say, I threw away the Blockbuster prize and kept the Fazoli&#039;s game piece. Like you mention above, the Blockbuster prize just seemed to good to be true with all the disclaimer text, so I just decided not to deal with it. I imagine financial customers would take a similar action.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was just noticing this same situation comparing game pieces from a Fazoli&#8217;s in store contest (not a financial brand, I realize, but hear me out). Each piece had a different prize, one from Fazolis and one from Blockbuster.</p>
<p>The statement of what you won from Fazoli&#8217;s took up 75% of the game piece with a small one or two sentence disclosure at the bottom.</p>
<p>The Blockbuster piece described the prize in a miniscule font at the top of the piece, occupying roughing 10% of the space. The other 90% of the available space was filled with even smaller text disclosing how the piece could be used, on what products, where it could be used and so on.</p>
<p>Needless to say, I threw away the Blockbuster prize and kept the Fazoli&#8217;s game piece. Like you mention above, the Blockbuster prize just seemed to good to be true with all the disclaimer text, so I just decided not to deal with it. I imagine financial customers would take a similar action.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

