<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: This Is a Bad Sign: Inaccuracies Will Give You Brand &#8216;Incontinence&#8217;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thefinancialbrand.com/4887/incontinence-sign/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thefinancialbrand.com/4887/incontinence-sign/</link>
	<description>Ideas and insights for financial marketers.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 May 2012 12:13:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Swafford</title>
		<link>http://thefinancialbrand.com/4887/incontinence-sign/comment-page-1/#comment-1812</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Swafford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 20:19:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thefinancialbrand.com/?p=4887#comment-1812</guid>
		<description>Actually, wouldn&#039;t a branch be closed because of INADEQUATE staffing? And the real issue is LAZINESS - people won&#039;t take an extra minute or two to READ what they&#039;ve WRITTEN and it is so worth the effort! You can always find phrases and/or wording that can be made clearer, more precise, less wordy when you simply proof your work by reading it again. And if you&#039;re not part of the grammar police, for crying-out-loud have someone else read the thing! Nothing says &quot;throw me into the trash can immediately&quot; more than misspellings and incorrect usage.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, wouldn&#8217;t a branch be closed because of INADEQUATE staffing? And the real issue is LAZINESS &#8211; people won&#8217;t take an extra minute or two to READ what they&#8217;ve WRITTEN and it is so worth the effort! You can always find phrases and/or wording that can be made clearer, more precise, less wordy when you simply proof your work by reading it again. And if you&#8217;re not part of the grammar police, for crying-out-loud have someone else read the thing! Nothing says &#8220;throw me into the trash can immediately&#8221; more than misspellings and incorrect usage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LB</title>
		<link>http://thefinancialbrand.com/4887/incontinence-sign/comment-page-1/#comment-1803</link>
		<dc:creator>LB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 13:38:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thefinancialbrand.com/?p=4887#comment-1803</guid>
		<description>I agree that typos can undermine your efforts. Remember that spell check won&#039;t pick up on some of the most common errors, such as your/you&#039;re and their/there/they&#039;re.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that typos can undermine your efforts. Remember that spell check won&#8217;t pick up on some of the most common errors, such as your/you&#8217;re and their/there/they&#8217;re.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Stephens</title>
		<link>http://thefinancialbrand.com/4887/incontinence-sign/comment-page-1/#comment-1789</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Stephens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 21:37:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thefinancialbrand.com/?p=4887#comment-1789</guid>
		<description>@Jonathan Gowins:  You gotta love spell check.  It&#039;s smart enough to correct misspelled &quot;inconvenience&quot; but not smart enough to recognize that &quot;branch&quot; and &quot;opened&quot; are both contextually wrong.  Good for a few laughs for sure!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Jonathan Gowins:  You gotta love spell check.  It&#8217;s smart enough to correct misspelled &#8220;inconvenience&#8221; but not smart enough to recognize that &#8220;branch&#8221; and &#8220;opened&#8221; are both contextually wrong.  Good for a few laughs for sure!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan Gowins</title>
		<link>http://thefinancialbrand.com/4887/incontinence-sign/comment-page-1/#comment-1788</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Gowins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 21:06:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thefinancialbrand.com/?p=4887#comment-1788</guid>
		<description>I disagree about the 2nd hand clothing store, although I see what you mean...I think any business that wants to be successful needs to nail this stuff down.

Thanks for the post; it is downright hilarious. We had an internal communication go out a couple years ago with the same thing...inconvenience was misspelled and auto correct picked incontinence to replace it so the author never knew. LOL</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I disagree about the 2nd hand clothing store, although I see what you mean&#8230;I think any business that wants to be successful needs to nail this stuff down.</p>
<p>Thanks for the post; it is downright hilarious. We had an internal communication go out a couple years ago with the same thing&#8230;inconvenience was misspelled and auto correct picked incontinence to replace it so the author never knew. LOL</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Stephens</title>
		<link>http://thefinancialbrand.com/4887/incontinence-sign/comment-page-1/#comment-1786</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Stephens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 17:57:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thefinancialbrand.com/?p=4887#comment-1786</guid>
		<description>JP, agreed.  It reminds me of my experience working with Ray Davis at Umpqua Bank.  In the earlier days of Umpqua&#039;s transformation, he was often asked by employees why the couldn&#039;t have Friday casual days.  His story was that someone could walk into the bank on Friday and ask, &quot;are you treating my money casually today, too?&quot;  When it comes to people&#039;s money, being casual is not a good thing.  Sure, you can and should have personality, but it has to come with high performance, and accuracy as you pointed out.  I&#039;d be nervous if I was a member of this CU--if they can&#039;t even get the signs right, how can I make sure they&#039;re handling my money responsibly?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JP, agreed.  It reminds me of my experience working with Ray Davis at Umpqua Bank.  In the earlier days of Umpqua&#8217;s transformation, he was often asked by employees why the couldn&#8217;t have Friday casual days.  His story was that someone could walk into the bank on Friday and ask, &#8220;are you treating my money casually today, too?&#8221;  When it comes to people&#8217;s money, being casual is not a good thing.  Sure, you can and should have personality, but it has to come with high performance, and accuracy as you pointed out.  I&#8217;d be nervous if I was a member of this CU&#8211;if they can&#8217;t even get the signs right, how can I make sure they&#8217;re handling my money responsibly?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

