<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Financial Firm Green Lights Social Media For All 1,000 Employees</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thefinancialbrand.com/21626/wedbush-securities-approves-social-media-for-all-staff/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thefinancialbrand.com/21626/wedbush-securities-approves-social-media-for-all-staff/</link>
	<description>Ideas and insights for financial marketers.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 May 2012 12:13:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: MiamiJorge</title>
		<link>http://thefinancialbrand.com/21626/wedbush-securities-approves-social-media-for-all-staff/comment-page-1/#comment-35029</link>
		<dc:creator>MiamiJorge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 15:53:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thefinancialbrand.com/?p=21626#comment-35029</guid>
		<description>@christina and @matt - you can certainly have a facebook personal profile and a facebook business page simultaneously. I do not advertise or use facebook personal profile for business, rather I have a facebook business page for that.

As a matter of fact, I created my facebook business page thru my facebook personal profile and i&#039;m the admin of the page.

Congrats to @wedbush on their initiative.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@christina and @matt &#8211; you can certainly have a facebook personal profile and a facebook business page simultaneously. I do not advertise or use facebook personal profile for business, rather I have a facebook business page for that.</p>
<p>As a matter of fact, I created my facebook business page thru my facebook personal profile and i&#8217;m the admin of the page.</p>
<p>Congrats to @wedbush on their initiative.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://thefinancialbrand.com/21626/wedbush-securities-approves-social-media-for-all-staff/comment-page-1/#comment-34653</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 19:30:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thefinancialbrand.com/?p=21626#comment-34653</guid>
		<description>@Christina: No, there is no way around this. If you have a personal Facebook account, you must use that account to run your page. You cannot have duplicate, fake, or separate accounts, even for admin purposes. If you do not have a personal account, you may create a business Facebook account. But that&#039;s ONLY if you don&#039;t have a personal account already. You can&#039;t have both.

Having multiple Twitter accounts is OK. I assume by &quot;separate professional accounts&quot; the article is intended to mean separate Twitter ACCOUNTS / separate Facebook PAGES.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Christina: No, there is no way around this. If you have a personal Facebook account, you must use that account to run your page. You cannot have duplicate, fake, or separate accounts, even for admin purposes. If you do not have a personal account, you may create a business Facebook account. But that&#8217;s ONLY if you don&#8217;t have a personal account already. You can&#8217;t have both.</p>
<p>Having multiple Twitter accounts is OK. I assume by &#8220;separate professional accounts&#8221; the article is intended to mean separate Twitter ACCOUNTS / separate Facebook PAGES.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Editor</title>
		<link>http://thefinancialbrand.com/21626/wedbush-securities-approves-social-media-for-all-staff/comment-page-1/#comment-34652</link>
		<dc:creator>Editor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 19:17:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thefinancialbrand.com/?p=21626#comment-34652</guid>
		<description>Excellent point Christina.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent point Christina.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christina</title>
		<link>http://thefinancialbrand.com/21626/wedbush-securities-approves-social-media-for-all-staff/comment-page-1/#comment-34651</link>
		<dc:creator>Christina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 19:13:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thefinancialbrand.com/?p=21626#comment-34651</guid>
		<description>How does it work to have two separate accounts on Facebook? Isn&#039;t this a violation of Facebook rules? I&#039;ve been trying to find a &quot;legal&quot; way around using my personal account.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How does it work to have two separate accounts on Facebook? Isn&#8217;t this a violation of Facebook rules? I&#8217;ve been trying to find a &#8220;legal&#8221; way around using my personal account.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Megan</title>
		<link>http://thefinancialbrand.com/21626/wedbush-securities-approves-social-media-for-all-staff/comment-page-1/#comment-34650</link>
		<dc:creator>Megan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 18:18:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thefinancialbrand.com/?p=21626#comment-34650</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m curious how the decision-makers at Wedbush addressed potential security concerns related to employees accessing social media sites from company computers. As a financial services institution were they at all worried about potential risks to their network? What, if any, were the arguments to move forward with social media access from a security perspective?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m curious how the decision-makers at Wedbush addressed potential security concerns related to employees accessing social media sites from company computers. As a financial services institution were they at all worried about potential risks to their network? What, if any, were the arguments to move forward with social media access from a security perspective?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Editor</title>
		<link>http://thefinancialbrand.com/21626/wedbush-securities-approves-social-media-for-all-staff/comment-page-1/#comment-34475</link>
		<dc:creator>Editor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 15:11:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thefinancialbrand.com/?p=21626#comment-34475</guid>
		<description>@Matt - I think things may be a little different in the investment industry, where individual advisers want/prefer having their own, independent social media accounts that they can use to interact specifically and exclusively with their clients/accounts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Matt &#8211; I think things may be a little different in the investment industry, where individual advisers want/prefer having their own, independent social media accounts that they can use to interact specifically and exclusively with their clients/accounts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://thefinancialbrand.com/21626/wedbush-securities-approves-social-media-for-all-staff/comment-page-1/#comment-34424</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 18:00:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thefinancialbrand.com/?p=21626#comment-34424</guid>
		<description>This is great and all - an organization trusting its employees to this extent - but I just don&#039;t see the benefits (if any) outweighing the possible risks and costs. 

Just look at the company&#039;s Facebook page: www.facebook.com/Wedbush. Only 59 fans? And they&#039;ve been active since Sept? If 94% of their employees don&#039;t care enough to even &quot;like&quot; their company&#039;s Facebook page, what makes Wedbush think this will add any significant value at all?

I think it would be wiser for Wadbush to improve their current SM presence - mainly a bulletin board of links to arbitrary pages on their brochure of a website - before trying to expand their presence. Better to do one thing very well than a lot of things poorly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is great and all &#8211; an organization trusting its employees to this extent &#8211; but I just don&#8217;t see the benefits (if any) outweighing the possible risks and costs. </p>
<p>Just look at the company&#8217;s Facebook page: <a href="http://www.facebook.com/Wedbush" rel="nofollow">http://www.facebook.com/Wedbush</a>. Only 59 fans? And they&#8217;ve been active since Sept? If 94% of their employees don&#8217;t care enough to even &#8220;like&#8221; their company&#8217;s Facebook page, what makes Wedbush think this will add any significant value at all?</p>
<p>I think it would be wiser for Wadbush to improve their current SM presence &#8211; mainly a bulletin board of links to arbitrary pages on their brochure of a website &#8211; before trying to expand their presence. Better to do one thing very well than a lot of things poorly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

