<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: In Brief: Cut the crap, shark fin soup, HelloWallet&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thefinancialbrand.com/12842/briefs-100729/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thefinancialbrand.com/12842/briefs-100729/</link>
	<description>Ideas and insights for financial marketers.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 12:47:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Editor</title>
		<link>http://thefinancialbrand.com/12842/briefs-100729/comment-page-1/#comment-8012</link>
		<dc:creator>Editor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 19:31:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thefinancialbrand.com/?p=12842#comment-8012</guid>
		<description>Sorry. Here&#039;s the link you need:
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704895004575395513588794780.html?mod=googlenews_wsj

I didn’t have the “?mod=googlenews_wsj” part of the URL. The WSJ and its stupid web address “rules.” It&#039;s fixed in the article now.

I can&#039;t ever understand why/how the WSJ organizes its URLs and permalinks. If you Google the headline for any WSJ article, you can always find a free one somewhere. Same thing for the NYT.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry. Here&#8217;s the link you need:<br />
<a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704895004575395513588794780.html?mod=googlenews_wsj" rel="nofollow">http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704895004575395513588794780.html?mod=googlenews_wsj</a></p>
<p>I didn’t have the “?mod=googlenews_wsj” part of the URL. The WSJ and its stupid web address “rules.” It&#8217;s fixed in the article now.</p>
<p>I can&#8217;t ever understand why/how the WSJ organizes its URLs and permalinks. If you Google the headline for any WSJ article, you can always find a free one somewhere. Same thing for the NYT.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mark zmarzly</title>
		<link>http://thefinancialbrand.com/12842/briefs-100729/comment-page-1/#comment-8008</link>
		<dc:creator>mark zmarzly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 18:41:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thefinancialbrand.com/?p=12842#comment-8008</guid>
		<description>Dang it, Jeffry...the WSJ post on overdraft solutions requires an online subscription!  I&#039;m dying to read it.  Do you know if it was published in the print edition and on what day?  mz</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dang it, Jeffry&#8230;the WSJ post on overdraft solutions requires an online subscription!  I&#8217;m dying to read it.  Do you know if it was published in the print edition and on what day?  mz</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced

Served from: thefinancialbrand.com @ 2012-02-09 08:42:44 -->
