<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Death Panel for America’s Smallest Credit Unions?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thefinancialbrand.com/12132/how-small-is-too-small/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thefinancialbrand.com/12132/how-small-is-too-small/</link>
	<description>Ideas and insights for financial marketers.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 22:58:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: John H Marsh</title>
		<link>http://thefinancialbrand.com/12132/how-small-is-too-small/#comment-6926</link>
		<dc:creator>John H Marsh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2010 16:51:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thefinancialbrand.com/?p=12132#comment-6926</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There are cu&#039;s with less than $1 million that provide valuable services to their members. Many are volunteer run, have allmost no overhead costs, and can make small loans at really great rates.
I have one in mind that did a great job for the members. OK, so it is now closd due to their sponsor closing. So what! The members did not want anything but small loans for a short time at a great rate. The c u did this very well and the members loved it. When it closed there was enough capital left over to pay a special dividend . There was no cost to NCUSIF. There are enough cu&#039;s of all asset sizes that are not viable.
A viable c u is one that is meeting the needs of the members and is maintaining required rerserves. I suggest we applaud all credit unions who are doing this.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are cu&#8217;s with less than $1 million that provide valuable services to their members. Many are volunteer run, have allmost no overhead costs, and can make small loans at really great rates.<br />
I have one in mind that did a great job for the members. OK, so it is now closd due to their sponsor closing. So what! The members did not want anything but small loans for a short time at a great rate. The c u did this very well and the members loved it. When it closed there was enough capital left over to pay a special dividend . There was no cost to NCUSIF. There are enough cu&#8217;s of all asset sizes that are not viable.<br />
A viable c u is one that is meeting the needs of the members and is maintaining required rerserves. I suggest we applaud all credit unions who are doing this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CU Water Cooler &#187; Blog Archive &#187; CU Water Cooler 6/8</title>
		<link>http://thefinancialbrand.com/12132/how-small-is-too-small/#comment-6922</link>
		<dc:creator>CU Water Cooler &#187; Blog Archive &#187; CU Water Cooler 6/8</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2010 11:30:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thefinancialbrand.com/?p=12132#comment-6922</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] &#8226;  Death panel for America’s smallest credit unions? [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &bull;  Death panel for America’s smallest credit unions? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

 Served from: thefinancialbrand.com @ 2013-05-26 02:07:23 by W3 Total Cache -->