<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Brandspeak: A Glossary of Branding Terms</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thefinancialbrand.com/10943/glossary-of-branding-terminology/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thefinancialbrand.com/10943/glossary-of-branding-terminology/</link>
	<description>Ideas and insights for financial marketers.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 00:33:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Twinkle twinkle little star&#8230; (how I wonder what you are) &#124; More Than Branding</title>
		<link>http://thefinancialbrand.com/10943/glossary-of-branding-terminology/comment-page-1/#comment-9086</link>
		<dc:creator>Twinkle twinkle little star&#8230; (how I wonder what you are) &#124; More Than Branding</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Aug 2010 14:25:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thefinancialbrand.com/?p=10943#comment-9086</guid>
		<description>[...] The Financial Brand [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The Financial Brand [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Editor</title>
		<link>http://thefinancialbrand.com/10943/glossary-of-branding-terminology/comment-page-1/#comment-5582</link>
		<dc:creator>Editor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Mar 2010 15:50:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thefinancialbrand.com/?p=10943#comment-5582</guid>
		<description>You can have a Value Proposition that is relevant to consumers but not differentiated from your competitors. For example, a big box retailer could promise/deliver &quot;low prices on a wide selection,&quot; which clearly promises value to consumers even though all the retailer&#039;s competitors could probably make the same claim.

If a Value Proposition is distinct and differentiated, then it is probably rising up to something more like a Unique Selling Proposition or Brand Position/Promise. This is certainly what an organization should be seeking. A Value Proposition &lt;em&gt;should&lt;/em&gt; be unique, and yet the value most organizations offer consumers is undifferentiated.

Also note: There may be a big difference between the Value Proposition as defined/intended by the organization and what consumers truly find valuable in the brand.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can have a Value Proposition that is relevant to consumers but not differentiated from your competitors. For example, a big box retailer could promise/deliver &#8220;low prices on a wide selection,&#8221; which clearly promises value to consumers even though all the retailer&#8217;s competitors could probably make the same claim.</p>
<p>If a Value Proposition is distinct and differentiated, then it is probably rising up to something more like a Unique Selling Proposition or Brand Position/Promise. This is certainly what an organization should be seeking. A Value Proposition <em>should</em> be unique, and yet the value most organizations offer consumers is undifferentiated.</p>
<p>Also note: There may be a big difference between the Value Proposition as defined/intended by the organization and what consumers truly find valuable in the brand.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cliff Zugay</title>
		<link>http://thefinancialbrand.com/10943/glossary-of-branding-terminology/comment-page-1/#comment-5581</link>
		<dc:creator>Cliff Zugay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Mar 2010 15:36:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thefinancialbrand.com/?p=10943#comment-5581</guid>
		<description>I was just using that example to suggest that a value proposition may ot be unique,  but if they are not competitors that is not a problem. The note that made me curious suggested that a value proposition need not be unique. I&#039;ve not heard that before and wonder in what instance that statement applies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was just using that example to suggest that a value proposition may ot be unique,  but if they are not competitors that is not a problem. The note that made me curious suggested that a value proposition need not be unique. I&#8217;ve not heard that before and wonder in what instance that statement applies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Editor</title>
		<link>http://thefinancialbrand.com/10943/glossary-of-branding-terminology/comment-page-1/#comment-5577</link>
		<dc:creator>Editor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Mar 2010 14:32:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thefinancialbrand.com/?p=10943#comment-5577</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not sure that I would characterize &quot;The Bay Area&#039;s Largest&quot; as a formal Value Proposition. There is no immediate value to consumers from simply shopping at the Bay Area&#039;s largest retailer. A statement of size may hint at certain things consumers do find valuable (e.g., small = personal, big = selection and cheaper), but such a statement itself makes no promise of value. It merely draws attention to a fact -- a differentiator that has no direct value or relevance to consumers.

I think a statement like &quot;The Bay Area&#039;s Largest&quot; is probably more like a slogan than a Value Proposition.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure that I would characterize &#8220;The Bay Area&#8217;s Largest&#8221; as a formal Value Proposition. There is no immediate value to consumers from simply shopping at the Bay Area&#8217;s largest retailer. A statement of size may hint at certain things consumers do find valuable (e.g., small = personal, big = selection and cheaper), but such a statement itself makes no promise of value. It merely draws attention to a fact &#8212; a differentiator that has no direct value or relevance to consumers.</p>
<p>I think a statement like &#8220;The Bay Area&#8217;s Largest&#8221; is probably more like a slogan than a Value Proposition.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cliff Zugay</title>
		<link>http://thefinancialbrand.com/10943/glossary-of-branding-terminology/comment-page-1/#comment-5573</link>
		<dc:creator>Cliff Zugay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Mar 2010 13:32:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thefinancialbrand.com/?p=10943#comment-5573</guid>
		<description>Great article....Brand Gap, I love it. It will be the phrase of the week here.

However, under Value Proposition, you suugest the proposition need not be unique. Now I can agree that there can be two brands that claim to be &quot;The Bay Area&#039;s Largest&quot; as long as one is San Francisco Bay, and the other Tampa Bay. But I&#039;d like to hear that defended if we are talking about direct competitors.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great article&#8230;.Brand Gap, I love it. It will be the phrase of the week here.</p>
<p>However, under Value Proposition, you suugest the proposition need not be unique. Now I can agree that there can be two brands that claim to be &#8220;The Bay Area&#8217;s Largest&#8221; as long as one is San Francisco Bay, and the other Tampa Bay. But I&#8217;d like to hear that defended if we are talking about direct competitors.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

